Reconciles Slice 0.6.5 (Renown & Reputation Foundation) against master's
persistent-HP-and-regeneration slice, which landed independently and
touches several of the same files (Character entity, CombatService,
EquipmentService, the inventory detail panel).
Conflict resolutions:
- CharacterStatsService/EquipmentService constructor wiring: kept
master's CharacterVitalsService injection, which this branch's
version of the same files didn't have yet.
- CombatService.performAction: kept master's HP-guard logic
(characterTooWounded, vitals pause-on-enter) alongside this branch's
multi-line calculate() call style.
- Inventory detail panel (.html/.ts/.scss/.spec.ts): master had
redesigned the panel (wrapping section, rarity styling, flavour
text, a shared inventory.labels.ts) on top of the OLD level-gated
component, since this branch's removal of the level gate (R4, Task
8/14) hadn't reached master yet. Kept master's visual redesign in
full, but with the level-gate concept removed throughout: no
requiredLevel stat block, no meetsLevelRequirement() branch in the
equip button, no now-dead .detail__value--unmet SCSS rule. Kept both
branches' independent tests (non-equippable-item, flavour-text).
- inventory-page.component.ts: dropped master's dead characterLevel
computed (nothing in the template read it, and the level concept is
gone); kept its independent bagCells/bagUsed/bagCapacity grid
feature, which has nothing to do with renown or level.
Post-merge fixture repairs (three files failed the Angular bundle
compile because they predate master's hpRegenPerSecond/hpRegenSince
fields or master's item description field, neither conflict-marked
since git considered them non-overlapping edits):
- app.spec.ts: a 'renders loaded character values' test added on
master after this branch forked still used the abolished level/
experience fields on its decoy fixture -- retargeted to renown.
- inventory-detail-panel.component.spec.ts: the ashPelt fixture added
by this branch's final-review follow-up predates master's required
description field.
- top-bar.component.spec.ts: this branch's fixture predates master's
required hpRegenPerSecond/hpRegenSince fields.
No database migration touches the same column: master's
1792000000000-AddHpRegeneration only adds characters.hp_regen_since,
independent of this slice's 1791000000000-CreateRenownAndReputation.
Timestamp ordering between the two was already correct with no rename
needed.
Verified: API 288/288 (267 from this slice + 21 from master), API
build zero errors, web 237/237 (230 from this slice + 7 from master).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Design ruling R7 abolishes XP as a concept and says the column goes with
it, but no task in the plan actually dropped it -- the plan only dropped
characters.experience and combat_rewards.experience_granted. Task 9
removed experienceReward from the seed literals, leaving
monster_definitions.experience_reward as a NOT NULL column with no
default that nothing supplies. The first monster insert against a real
database would have failed on a constraint violation.
No suite here could have caught it: none of them connect to Postgres.
Drops the column in the slice migration (which has never been run, so
amending it in place is correct rather than stacking a second one),
removes the entity field, and clears the three test fixtures that still
set it. silver_min/silver_max deliberately stay -- spec 15 keeps a
direct currency drop available as a lore-valid exception, and XP has no
such carve-out.
Also retargets the seed idempotency test off renown: 1, which is the
seed's own default and so could not distinguish "preserved" from
"reset to default".
NOTE ON SCOPE: this commit also absorbs a Prettier reformatting pass
that was already sitting uncommitted in the working tree, which is why
it touches ~59 files. That churn is purely cosmetic line-rewrapping --
verified by inspection, and the suite is green at 267/267 with the build
at exactly the 3 expected errors owned by Tasks 10 and 11. The repo is
not Prettier-clean at baseline (119 files still flagged), so this was a
partial run by an earlier step, not a deliberate repo-wide format.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
